Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Odeh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Angelini, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Odeh, A.
Right arrow Articles by Angelini, G. D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Haematocrit measurements during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: comparison of three stat methods with a blood cell counter

Ahmed Al-Odeh

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary

Zsolt A. Varga

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary

Gianni D. Angelini

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary

Monitoring packed cell volume (PCV) is essential to safeguard oxygen delivery to the tissues during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared the results obtained using a PCV monitor, a blood gas analyser and a microcentrifuge with those from a laboratory-based automated blood cell counter. PCV was measured in 221 samples of 40 patients undergoing open-heart surgery. The limits of agreement (mean difference ± 2 SD) was unacceptably wide when the results obtained with the PCV monitor and the blood gas analyser were compared with those of the automated blood cell counter. This was most pronounced when PCV was measured in low concentration samples. The microcentrifuge showed good limits of agreement regardless of sample concentration.

The data suggests that measurement of PCV by either continuous monitoring or by a blood gas analyser is not an accurate alternative to an established laboratory method. The microcentrifuge is the most accurate method of the ones investigated to measure haematocrit during CPB.

Perfusion, Vol. 9, No. 2, 127-134 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919400900207
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?