|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Roller and centrifugal pumps compared in vitro with regard to haemolysis, granulocyte and complement activation
Oddvar Moen
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Ullevål Hospital
Erik Fosse
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ullevål Hospital
Jennifer Bråten
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ullevål Hospital
Conny Andersson
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ullevål Hospital
Magne K. Fagerhol
Blood Bank and Department of Immunology, Ullevål Hospital, Norway
Per Venge
Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Kolbjørn Hegåsen
Institute of Immunology and Rheumatology, The National Hospital, University of Oslo
Tom Eirik Mollnes
Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Nordland Central Hospital, Bodø, Norway
A Biomedicus centrifugal pump and a Polystan roller pump were compared in vitro with regard to differences in haemolysis, granulocyte and complement activation. Six circuits of tubing and oxygenators were connected to each pump. Heparinized fresh human blood was circulated for 72 hours in the systems. Blood samples were drawn at defined intervals. Haemolysis was assessed by determination of lactate dehydrogenase (LD) and potassium, and granulocyte activation by quantification of the granulocyte proteins calprotectin, lactoferrin and myeloperoxidase. Complement activation was assessed by measuring C3 activation products (C3b, iC3b and C3c), and the terminal C5b-9 complement complex (TCC). The results indicate more haemolysis and complement activation in the roller pump group, revealed by significantly higher concentrations of LD, potassium, C3 activation products and TCC. Calprotectin, lactoferrin and myeloperoxidase were all significantly increased in both groups, but the rise appeared earlier in the roller pump group. The concentrations of LD and potassium both correlated significantly with C3 activation products, indicating that complement activation may at least partly be responsible for the haemolysis.
Perfusion, Vol. 9, No. 2,
109-117 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919400900205
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
G. S. Murphy, E. A. Hessel II, and R. C. Groom
Optimal Perfusion During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: An Evidence-Based Approach
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2009;
108(5):
1394 - 1417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C R Valeri, H Macgregor, G Ragno, N Healey, J Fonger, and S F Khuri
Effects of centrifugal and roller pumps on survival of autologous red cells in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
Perfusion,
September 1, 2006;
21(5):
291 - 296.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lombardi, J. Sedgwick, J. Schenbeck, W. Lubbers, R. E Ferguson, A. Gardner, J. L McNamara, and P. Eghtesady
Cardiopulmonary bypass in the immature fetus through novel use of a mini-centrifugal pump
Perfusion,
May 1, 2006;
21(3):
185 - 191.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R de Vroege, F te Meerman, L Eijsman, W R Wildevuur, C. R. Wildevuur, and W van Oeveren
Induction and detection of disturbed homeostasis in cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion,
September 1, 2004;
19(5):
267 - 276.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Bennett, S Horton, C Thuys, S Augustin, M Rosenberg, and C Brizard
Pump-induced haemolysis: a comparison of short-term ventricular assist devices
Perfusion,
March 1, 2004;
19(2):
107 - 111.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Jensen, S. Andreasson, A. Bengtsson, H. Berggren, R. Ekroth, L. Lindholm, and J. Ouchterlony
Influence of two different perfusion systems on inflammatory response in pediatric heart surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
March 1, 2003;
75(3):
919 - 925.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.S. Morgan, M. Codispoti, K. Sanger, and P.S. Mankad
Superiority of centrifugal pump over roller pump in paediatric cardiac surgery: prospective randomised trial
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
May 1, 1999;
13(5):
526 - 532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Baufreton, L. Intrator, P. G.M. Jansen, H. te Velthuis, P. Le Besnerais, A. Vonk, J.-P. Farcet, C. R.H. Wildevuur, and D. Y. Loisance
Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass using roller or centrifugal pumps
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
April 1, 1999;
67(4):
972 - 977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S D Hansbro, D A. Sharpe, R Catchpole, K R Welsh, C M Munsch, J P McGoldrick, and P H Kay
Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: an in vivo comparison of standard roller pumps, nonocclusive roller pumps and centrifugal pumps
Perfusion,
January 1, 1999;
14(1):
3 - 10.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ashraf, J. Butler, Y. Tian, D. Cowan, S. Lintin, N. R. Saunders, K. G. Watterson, and P. G. Martin
Inflammatory Mediators in Adults Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Comparison of Centrifugal and Roller Pumps
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
February 1, 1998;
65(2):
480 - 484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M G Macey, D A McCarthy, U H Trivedi, G E Venn, D J Chambers, and K A Brown
Neutrophil adhesion molecule expression during cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparative study of roller and centrifugal pumps
Perfusion,
September 1, 1997;
12(5):
293 - 301.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Moen, E. Fosse, E. Dregelid, V. Brockmeier, C. Andersson, K. Hogasen, P. Venge, T. E. Mollnes, and P. Kierulf
Centrifugal Pump and Heparin Coating Improves Cardiopulmonary Bypass Biocompatibility
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
October 1, 1996;
62(4):
1134 - 1140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Moen, E. Fosse, J. Braten, C. Andersson, K. Hogasen, T. Mollnes, P. Venge, and P. Kierulf
Differences in blood activation related to roller/centrifugal pumps and heparin coated/uncoated surfaces in a cardiopulmonary bypass model circuit
Perfusion,
March 1, 1996;
11(2):
113 - 123.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Perttila, M. Salo, and O. Peltola
Comparison of the effects of centrifugal versus roller pump on the immune response in open-heart surgery
Perfusion,
July 1, 1995;
10(4):
249 - 256.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
