Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fried, D. W
Right arrow Articles by Mohamed, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fried, D. W
Right arrow Articles by Mohamed, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Proportioned blood cardioplegia delivery systems- are you del iveri ng the [K+] you expect?

David W Fried

Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia

Hasratt Mohamed

Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia

This study was conducted to compare the actual potassium concentration [K+] delivered from a standard 4:1 ratio blood cardioplegia solution with the predicted [K+]. We found that the delivered [K+] ranged from 18.15 to 21.2 mEq/I although we predicted 22.0 mEq/I from our mathematical model. The factors that contributed to this difference were investigated. The ratio of blood:crystalloid was determined by: (1) potassium dilution technique; (2) volume output technique; and (3) from the manufacturer's tubing specifications and tolerances. This resulted in blood:crystalloid ratios of 3.86:1 (3.35-4.49:1), 3.74:1, and 4.0:1 (3.47-4.68:1), respectively. Analysis of the crystalloid component revealed an average [K+] of 75.7 mEq/I (70.0-81.5 mEq/I). Patient [K+] during the study ranged from 4.3 to 6.4 mEq/l. When the effect of clinical extremes in ratio, crystalloid [K+], and patient [K+] were considered, a range of cardioplegia [K+] of 16.0-24.3 mEq/I would be predicted. It was concluded that the ability to control the delivered [K+] with any precision is limited. Manufacturers should (1) match the tubing in such a way as to minimize ratio extremes and (2) adopt a tubing tolerance of ± 0.003 inches. Perfusionists should (1) analyse the crystalloid solution prior to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and (2) analyse the cardioplegia [K+] when there is difficulty arresting the heart or if the patient [K+] is excessively elevated.

Perfusion, Vol. 8, No. 5, 401-407 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919300800507


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?