Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cosgrove, D. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Use of aprotinin in repeat myocardial revascularization: Cleveland Clinic experience

Delos M Cosgrove

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Preliminary findings of a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of aprotinin in patients undergoing repeat myocardial revascularization procedures are presented. Use of high- or low-dose aprotinin led to signfiicant (p < 0.001) reductions in postoperative chest tube drainage compared with placebo (720 ± 753 ml, 866 ± 1636 ml, and 1121 ± 683 ml, respectively). Aprotinin also yielded significant reductions in transfusion requirements (2.1 ± 4.2 units, 4.8 ± 11.8 units, and 4.1 ± 6.2 units). These reductions were similar in a subgroup of patients who received aspirin preoperatively. In both aprotinin groups, there was a non-significant trend toward increased risk of Q-wave myocardial infarction. In six of 12 vein grafts studied at post-mortem examination from aprotinin-treated patients, acute vein graft thrombosis was found. This was not seen in any of five grafts from placebo-treated patients. In conclusion, aprotinin significantly reduces bleeding and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing repeat myocardial revascularization. The non-significantly increased risk of graft thrombosis requires further study.

Perfusion, Vol. 8, No. 1 suppl, 36-42 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919300800106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
I. Rodrigus, K. Vermeyen, S. De Hert, B. Amsel, and P. Walter
Efficacy and safety of aprotinin in aortocoronary bypass and valve replacement operations: a placebo-controlled randomized double-blind study
Perfusion, January 1, 1996; 11(4): 313 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]