| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
The minimized extracorporeal circulation system causes less inflammation and organ damageDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore surtk{at}nus.edu.sg
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Department of Anesthesiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore The minimized extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) is being used to reduce priming volume and blood/polymer contact during cardiac procedures. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and potential advantages of the system in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. We included two groups of patients destined for CABG in a prospective, randomized study: Group A was operated on the usual pump (n = 30) while Group B was operated using the MECC (n = 50). Pre-operative demographics, intra-operative times and values as well as a series of post-operative outcome data (blood loss, transfusion requirements, ventilation time, ICU and hospital stay) were recorded. CK, CK-MB, troponin-T, IL-6 and IL-8 were measured. Pre-operative and post-operative lung function were assessed. In the MECC-operated group, patients developed less post-operative troponin-T (0.2 ± 0.3 vs. 0.5 ± 0.5 ng/mL, p=0.031) and less IL-8 (13.8 ± 5 vs. 22.5 ± 0.5 µg/L, p = 0.05). While blood loss was comparable in both groups, packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were given less frequently in the MECC group (p = 0.015 resp. 0.022). The one-tailed Students t-test revealed shorter bypass time in the MECC group (74 ± 17 vs. 82 ± 24 min). There was no difference in ventilation and ICU-time (patients were not treated in a fast-track fashion). The FEV1 was better in the MECC group (relative values: 70.1 ± 18.2% vs. 61.1 ± 12.3%, p = 0.02). Utilization of the MECC may cause less cytokine (IL-8) liberation, owing to less blood/tubing contact, as well as less red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma demand. It may also be the circuit in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Key Words: cardiopulmonary bypass extracorporeal circulation minimally invasive
Perfusion, Vol. 23, No. 3,
147-151 (2008) |
||||