Perfusion

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mulholland, J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, M.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mulholland, J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, M.D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Perfusion, Vol. 22, No. 3, 161-166 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0267659107076880

Miniature cardiopulmonary bypass — the Hammersmith experience

J.W. Mulholland

Department of Clinical Perfusion Science, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK, London Perfusion Science, Westminster, London, UK, john{at}londonperfusionscience.com

J.R. Anderson

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

G.J. Yarham

Department of Clinical Perfusion Science, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK, London Perfusion Science, Westminster, London, UK

S. Tuladhur

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

I. Saed

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

M.D. Oliver

Department of Clinical Perfusion Science, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK, London Perfusion Science, Westminster, London, UK

The decision to embark on a miniature cardiopulmonary bypass programme requires careful planning. The objective of this paper is to present our experience and initial findings for consideration by our multidisciplinary peers, who may wish to implement this technology at their own hospitals. The paper reviews the evolution of our programme over the first 150 clinical cases and our current position on the advantages and disadvantages of miniature cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion (2007) 22, 161—166.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?