Perfusion

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scolletta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frazier, O H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scolletta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Frazier, O H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Perfusion, Vol. 22, No. 1, 63-66 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0267659106074784
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Pulse wave analysis to assess systemic blood flow during mechanical biventricular support

Sabino Scolletta

Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, University of Siena, Siena, Italy, scolletta{at}unisi.it

Igor D Gregoric

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas

Luigi Muzzi

Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

Branislav Radovancevic

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas

O Howard Frazier

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas

Measurement of systemic blood flow is of crucial importance in patients on mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We reported the case of a 65-year-old female patient in severe cardiogenic shock undergoing left (Jarvik 2000 axial flow pump) and right (Levitronix-Centrimag centrifugal pump) ventricular assist device implant. Evaluation of blood flow was obtained by ultrasonic flowmetry, continuous thermodilution technique, and pressure recording analytical method (PRAM). This pulse contour system allows beat-by-beat systemic blood flow assessment from the analysis of radial artery pressure waveform. At a Jarvik pump speed ≤ 10 000 rotations per minutes (rpm), thermodilution and PRAM showed similar blood flow values. At a Jarvik pump speed ≥11 000 rpm, the aortic valve did not open and PRAM did not provide blood flow values due to nonpulsatile blood flow. The present paper describes the first experience with PRAM in a single patient on MCS. Further studies are required to assess the validity of PRAM as an additional monitoring system in the setting of ventricular assist device support. Perfusion (2007) 22, 63-66.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?