Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, D. C
Right arrow Articles by Newman, S. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitaker, D. C
Right arrow Articles by Newman, S. P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A prospective clinical study of cerebral microemboli and neuropsychological outcome comparing vent-line and auto-venting arterial line filters: both filters are equally safe

Donald C Whitaker

Centre for Behavioural and Social Sciences in Medicine, University College London, London, UK

Jan Stygall

Centre for Behavioural and Social Sciences in Medicine, University College London, London, UK

Chris Hope-Wynne

The Middlesex Hospital, London, UK

Robin K Walesby

The Middlesex Hospital, London, UK

Michael JG Harrison

Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, London, UK

Stanton P Newman

Centre for Behavioural and Social Sciences in Medicine, University College London, London, UK, s.newman{at}ucl.ac.uk

Introduction: Microemboli are the main implicated cause of neuropsychological (NP) impairment after cardiac surgery. This prospective clinical trial compared the effect of an auto-venting arterial line filter on intraoperative cerebral microemboli and NP outcome compared to an arterial line filter with a vent line, in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Methods: One hundred and ten patients received either an Avecor Affinity (n = 73) or Pall AV-6 (n = 37) control filter. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass were recorded by transcranial Doppler monitoring of the right middle cerebral artery. Evidence of cerebral impairment was obtained by comparing patients’ performance in a NP test battery (nine tests) administered 6-8 weeks postoperatively with their pre-operative scores.

Results: During cardiopulmonary bypass, the median number and range of microemboli were 67 (5-846) and 55 (2-773) for the Avecor and AV-6 groups, respectively (p = 0.47). There was no difference in NP outcome.

Conclusion: There is no difference in the filtering ability of vent-line and auto-vent filters as assessed by cerebral microemboli. This, together with the similar NP outcome, suggests that both types of filter are equally safe for clinical use.

Perfusion, Vol. 21, No. 2, 83-86 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659106pf852oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?