Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samolyk, K. A
Right arrow Articles by Bissinger, R. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samolyk, K. A
Right arrow Articles by Bissinger, R. C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A new practical technique to reduce allogeneic blood exposure and hospital costs while preserving clotting factors after cardiopulmonary bypass: the Hemobag®

Keith A Samolyk

Global Blood Resources LLC, Somers, USA, gbrllc{at}comcast.net

Scott R Beckmann

Salem Hospital, Salem, USA, Fresenius Medical Care Extracorporeal Alliance, San Diego, USA

Randall C Bissinger

Salem Hospital, Salem, USA

Recent data independently linking allogeneic blood use to increased morbidity and mortality after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) warrants the study of new methods to employ unique and familiar technology to reduce allogeneic blood exposure. The Hemobag® allows the open-heart team to concentrate residual CPB circuit contents and return a high volume of autologous clotting factors and blood cells to the patient.

Fifty patients from all candidates were arbitrarily selected to receive the Hemobag® (HB) therapy. A retrospective control group of 50 non-Hemobag® (NHB) patients were matched to the HB group patient-by-patient for comparison according to surgeon, type of procedure, age, body surface area (BSA), body weight and CPB time. Many efforts to conserve blood (Cell Saver® and ANH) were employed in both groups. Post-CPB cell washing of circuit contents was additionally employed in the control group.

There were no significant differences between the HB and NHB groups in regard to patient morphology, pre-op cell concentrations, distribution of surgeon or procedures (41% valve, 16% valve/coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), balance CABG), pump and ischemic times and Bayes National Risk scores. The average volume returned to the patient from the HB was 8179/198 mL (1 SD). Average processing time was 11 min. The Hemobag®contained an average platelet count of 2309/80 K/mm3, fibrinogen concentration of 4139/171 mg/dl, total protein of 8.09/2.8 gm/dl, albumin of 4.49/1.2 gm/dl and hematocrit of 439/7%. Factor VII, IX and X levels in three HB contents averaged 259% greater than baseline. Substantial reductions were achieved in both allogeneic blood product avoidance and cost to the hospital with use of the HB.

Infusion of the Hemobag® concentrate appears to recover safely substantial proteins, clotting factor and cell concentration for all types of cardiac procedures, maintaining the security of a primed circuit.

Perfusion, Vol. 20, No. 6, 343-349 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659105pf831oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?