Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kriewall, T. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kriewall, T. J
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Manufacturers’ approaches in the development of intelligent multilevel safety systems to assist perfusionists during cardiopulmonary bypass

Timothy J Kriewall

Wisconsin Lutheran College, Milwaukee, WI, USA, tim_kriewall{at}wlc.edu

How safe is safe? The design intent of perfusion safety systems is to offer maximum flexibility, low-cost and fail-safe features. While easily said, these requirements are difficult to deliver in a perfusion world where standardization is uncommon. This paper reviews the challenges all manufacturers face as they strive to offer the ultimate in safety, keeping the price affordable for the technology deployed and the usability common sense for the perfusionist using the equipment. As microprocessors are able to assist designers in providing intelligent, multilevel safety systems, care must be taken during the design process to balance technological ability with intuitive use. In the final analysis, however, it is the perfusionist who is the primary safety system, and the technology is his or her backup.

Perfusion, Vol. 20, No. 4, 227-232 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659105pf811oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?