This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stammers, A. H Articles by Elmore, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stammers, A. H Articles by Elmore, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Blood Transfusion and Donation Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Utilization of rapid-infuser devices for massive blood loss

Perfusion Department, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, ahstammers{at}geisinger.edu

James D Murdock

Perfusion Department, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Myra H Klayman

Perfusion Department, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Cody Trowbridge

Perfusion Department, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Bianca R Yen

Perfusion Department, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

David Franklin

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Department, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

James Elmore

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Department, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Rapid volume replacement for severe hemorrhage continues to challenge the clinician involved in the care of the patient suffering hemorrhagic shock. We report on the development and utilization of two rapid-infuser systems for volume replacement in critically ill patients presenting in extremis.

We have developed rapid-infusion circuits by using commercially available devices available at our institution. The primary pumping mechanism is either a centrifugal pump (Revolution^TMCOBE Cardiovascular, Arvada, CO, USA), or the Myocar-dial Protection System (MPS^TM - Quest Medical, Allen, TX, USA), and offers advantages over commercially available devices. Both circuits consist of a cardiotomy reservoir, a cardioplegia delivery set, assorted tubing and connectors, and a heater-cooler system.

Between January and October of 2003, 15 procedures were performed which utilized one of these two devices. There were nine ruptured aneurysms, five traumas and one radical nephrectomy. The rapid infusion time averaged 228.59±105.7 min where 10.49±9.4 L of autotransfusion volume was processed, with 3.99±4.2 L of red cell volume reinfused. The allogeneic blood products that were transfused included packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma, as well as 5% albumin. There were no intraoperative deaths and the rapid-infuser was considered lifesaving in all instances.

Mechanical rapid infusion systems may be lifesaving when severe hypovolemia or hemorrhagic shock is encountered. While both devices are able to meet the requirements of rapid fluid replacement, the MPS offers the most safety features and has become the standard of care at our institution.

Perfusion, Vol. 20, No. 2, 65-69 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659105pf787oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?