Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manche, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Manche, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kirk, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ß2 microglobulin excretion as an index of renal function on pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary perfusion

AR Manche

The London Chest Hospital and The London Hospital, London

RK Walesby

The London Chest Hospital and The London Hospital, London

AW Goode

The London Chest Hospital and The London Hospital, London

Cjc Kirk

The London Chest Hospital and The London Hospital, London

The renal clearance of ß2 microglobulin was measured in two groups of patients undergoing surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass. The first group of patients received pulsatile perfusion whilst group two were subjected to non pulsatile flow.

There was no difference between the two groups in the rate of ß2 clearance throughout the study period. For both groups the clearance rate was signifi cantly elevated from four hours following surgery to the third postoperative day. These results suggest that during standard periods of cardiopulmonary bypass, pulsatile perfusion does not confer any significant advantage over conventional nonpulsatile flow with regard to renal blood flow and tubular function.

Perfusion, Vol. 2, No. 3, 195-203 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/026765918700200308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?