Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svenmarker, S
Right arrow Articles by Häggmark, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svenmarker, S
Right arrow Articles by Häggmark, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Measurement of the activated clotting time during cardiopulmonary bypass: differences between Hemotec® ACT and Hemochron® Jr apparatus

S Svenmarker

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Science, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden, staffan.svenmarker.us{at}vll.se

M Appelblad

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Science, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden

E Jansson

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Science, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden

S Häggmark

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Science, University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden

Background: Measurement of the activated clotting time (ACT) represents a standard method for coagulatory assessments. The test employs specific agents to trigger the coagulation process. The present study aimed to compare kaolin (Hemotec®) versus a combination of silica, kaolin and phospholipid (Hemochron® Jr) ACTs.

Methods: Hemotec® and Hemochron® Jr ACT monitors were compared by simultaneous measurement of paired arterial blood samples (n-114) with respect to precision and bias during clinical conditions of cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB). The influence of haemodilution on the ACT was tested in an ex-vivo model.

Results: The precision of Hemotec® and Hemochron®Jr ACT measurements attained 21±2.6 s versus 27.0±2.6 s(p= 0.126) during CPB and 2.5±2.2 s versus 9.4±6.9 s (p= 0.000) after protamine administration, respectively. The Hemochron® Jr monitor was associated with a bias of –102±13.7 s compared to the Hemotec® ACT monitor (p= 0.000) during CPB and –6.9±2.9 s after protamine (p= 0.025). Linear regression analysis of ACT readings between monitors reached r- 0.526 (p= 0.000). Hemochron® Jr ACT values correlated with the erythrocyte volume fraction r- 0.379 (p= 0.000). Ex-vivo data indicated that the Hemotec® ACT monitor was associated with relatively higher ACT readings after haemodilution.

Conclusion: The ACT is not a standardized measure. Test results are strongly associated with the specific compounds used to initiate the coagulation process.

Perfusion, Vol. 19, No. 5, 289-294 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659104pf755oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?