This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ginther, R. Articles by Darling, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ginther, R., Jr Articles by Darling, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills: 2002 survey results

Department of Cardiovascular Perfusion, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA

Roy Fillingham

Department of Cardiovascular Perfusion, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA

Bruce Searles

Department of Cardiovascular Perfusion, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA

Edward Darling

Department of Cardiovascular Perfusion, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA, darlinge{at}upstate.edu

Serious complications during the performance of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are an infrequent event. However, when potentially fatal technical complications, such as oxygenator or pump failure, do occur, it necessitates a swift and well-co-ordinated response. Periodic performances of drills that simulate various CPB crises are a way to improve individual perfusionist proficiency during disaster situations. The purpose of this study is to determine the utilization of crisis management drills in perfusion departments. Every open-heart program listed by the American Hospital Association in the New England states (Maine, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut) and New York were contacted by telephone. Of the 61 contacted, 59 participated for a response rate of 97%. Demographically, the survey represents 312 perfusionists and 47 227 cases annually. While 97% of the perfusion departments believed that regular practice and performance of crisis management drills would improve individual proficiency, only 17% of the programs mandated that their perfusionists perform crisis management drills as a matter of departmental policy. Reasons expressed for not having a formal written policy regarding performance crisis management drills were as follows: left up to the individuals to maintain proficiency 19 (39%), not motivated 11 (22%), confident of proficiency 9 (19%), no time 8 (17%), dubious value 1 (2%), and cost prohibitive 1 (2%). While it is nearly universally accepted that periodically practicing perfusion crisis management drills in a `wet lab' environment would improve proficiency, only a minority of perfusion teams deem this a high enough priority to make it a matter of formal departmental policy.

Perfusion, Vol. 18, No. 5, 299-302 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659103pf680oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N Momose and Y Tomizawa Incident-simulating device with wireless control for extracorporeal circulation crisis management drills Perfusion, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 17 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				U Da Broi, V Adami, E Falasca, W Malangone, S Crini, and A Degrassi A new oxygenator change-out system and procedure Perfusion, September 1, 2006; 21(5): 297 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]