This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Engström, K. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Engström, K. G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The embolic potential of liquid fat in pericardial suction blood, and its elimination

Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Örebro, Sweden, kge{at}orebroll.se

Diffuse brain damage is a complex problem in cardiac surgery postoperatively. Liquid fat from recycled pericardial suction blood (PSB) is an embolic source. PSB can be discarded, but the recycling can be life saving, and methods have been developed to remove the fat. Blood washing by centrifugation is suggested to be the most effective method. In retained PSB, fat also separates without centrifugation, which is a novel and simple approach. Alternatively, inline fat filtration is easily accomplished but its effectiveness has been questioned. The present study aimed to investigate this phenomenon. Fat was heat extracted from retrieved pericardial fat tissue of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients (n= 6), and was mixed, 1.25%, with postoperative mediastinal-shed blood. The mixture was filtered using a LipiGuard SB at constant flow rate. The filtration was scaled down to 3 mL and performed under temperature control, 37°C, 20°C and 10°C. At these temperatures fat removal was 46.9±6.1%, 61.5±7.0% and 76.8±5.0%, respectively, with a statistical difference of P=0.001. The improved fat removal at low temperature dramatically increased filtration pressures (p<0.001) and caused haemolysis (P=0.018). It is concluded that fat filtration is technically difficult. Cooling of blood increases fat extraction, but with negative side effects due to filter occlusion.

Perfusion, Vol. 18, No. 1 suppl, 69-74 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659103pf630oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. De Somer Optimal Versus Suboptimal Perfusion During Cardiopulmonary Bypass and the Inflammatory Response Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2009; 13(2): 113 - 117. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Appelblad and K. G. Engstrom Fat content in pericardial suction blood and the efficacy of spontaneous density separation and surface adsorption in a prototype system for fat reduction J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2007; 134(2): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. de Vries, Y. J. Gu, Y. L. Douglas, W. J. Post, H. Lip, and W. van Oeveren Clinical evaluation of a new fat removal filter during cardiac surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 261 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Engstrom Contaminating fat in pericardial suction blood: a clinical, technical and scientific challenge Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S21 - S31. [Abstract] [PDF]