|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Modified ultrafiltration in surgical correction of congenital heart disease with cardiopulmonary bypass
Miguel A Maluf
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil, mamaluf{at}directnet.com.br
The surgical correction of congenital heart disease using haemodilution and hypothermia with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may expose patients to tissue ischaemia and initiate a systemic inflammatory response, increasing the total body water and inducing impairment, especially of heart, lung and brain function.
It is possible to use ultrafiltration during CPB in the rewarming phase to remove water accumulation in the third space (conventional ultrafiltration). The reduced volume of prime used in children and the ability only to filter the reservoir blood during CPB led the Great Ormond Street Group to modify the method of ultrafiltration with regards to the placement of the filter and the timing of filtration (post-CPB). The main advantage of the modified technique is the ultrafiltration of the patient.
A prospective nonrandomized study has been conducted to compare conventional with conventional+modified ultrafiltration. From January 1996 to March 1998, 41 patients underwent correction of congenital heart disease and were submitted to a comparative study (homogeneous groups), using either the conventional or the conventional+modified ultrafiltration techniques. There were no technical complications, no patient required mediastinal re-exploration due to bleeding and it was possible to close all the chests.
There were significant differences in the ultrafiltrate volume balance (143.39 /54.3 versus 2279 /71.4 mL; P B /0.001) but there were no significant differences in clinical postoperative evolution between the conventional and the conventional+modified ultrafiltration.
Perfusion, Vol. 18, No. 1 suppl,
61-68 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659103pf629oa

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Perez-Vela, E Ruiz-Alonso, F Guillen-Ramirez, M. Garcia-Maellas, E Renes-Carreno, M Cerro-Garcia, J Cortina-Romero, and I Hernandez-Rodriguez
ICU outcomes in adult cardiac surgery patients in relation to ultrafiltration type
Perfusion,
March 1, 2008;
23(2):
79 - 87.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Jegger, S. Sundaram, K. Shah, I. Mallabiabarrena, G. Mucciolo, and L.K. von Segesser
Using computational fluid dynamics to evaluate a novel venous cannula (Smart canula (R)) for use in cardiopulmonary bypass operating procedures
Perfusion,
July 1, 2007;
22(4):
257 - 265.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Jegger, P.-G. Chassot, M.-A. Bernath, J. Horisberger, P. Gersbach, P. Tozzi, D. Delay, and L. K. von Segesser
A novel technique using echocardiography to evaluate venous cannula performance perioperatively in CPB cardiac surgery.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
April 1, 2006;
29(4):
525 - 529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus
Modulation of Systemic Inflammatory Response after Cardiac Surgery
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann,
December 1, 2005;
13(4):
382 - 395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Rodriguez, M. Ruel, L. Broecker, and G. Cornel
High Flow Rates During Modified Ultrafiltration Decrease Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity and Venous Oxygen Saturation in Infants
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
July 1, 2005;
80(1):
22 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Corno, J. Horisberger, J. David, and L. K. von Segesser
Right atrial surgery with unsnared inferior vena cava
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
July 1, 2004;
26(1):
219 - 220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S Chew
Does modified ultrafiltration reduce the systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?
Perfusion,
January 1, 2004;
19(1_suppl):
S57 - S60.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|