This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by DeBois, W. J Articles by Isom, O W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DeBois, W. J Articles by Isom, O W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Negative fluid displacement: an alternative method to assess patency of arterial line cannulation

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA, wdebois{at}nyp.org

Leonard N Girardi

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

Leonard Y Lee

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

Charles Mack

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

Barbara Elmer

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

Kevin McCusker

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

James McVey

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

Karl H Krieger

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

O Wayne Isom

New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York Weill Cornell Center, New York, USA

Optimal flow rate with minimal pressure gradient is the goal of arterial cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Misplacement of the arterial cannula or vascular pathology can lead to hemolysis or intimal damage with subsequent aortic dissection. The risk of dissection with aortic cannulation is low, 0.04-0.2% for ascending aortic cannulation and 0.2-3% for femoral cannulation. However, dissection-related mortality is significant. Common methods for assessing adequacy of arterial cannulation include minimal pressure when injecting 100-mL boluses and the presence of pulsation in the cannula. Using these techniques, misplacement of the cannula can be masked due to the small amount of volume that is transfused during the assessment. Displacement of fluid into a cannula that is in a false lumen or close to the intimal surface may not indicate a misplaced arterial cannula. Negative fluid displacement is an alternative method of evaluating the integrity of arterial cannulation. During retrograde arterial priming (RAP), fluid is drained from the arterial cannula into a collection bag. Absence of fluid return or a flow B /500 mL/minute is indicative of either arterial line occlusion or cannula misplacement. At this point, the arterial cannula can be repositioned prior to instituting CPB. Since using this technique in over 13 000 bypass procedures, we have had only one dissection. This one event occurred during partial occlusion clamping of the ascending aorta. With increased use of femoral cannulation for minimally invasive cardiac surgical procedures, this RAP technique can enhance the perfusionist’s and the surgeon’s ability to safely perform bypass in the presence of higher dissection risk.

Perfusion, Vol. 18, No. 1, 67-70 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659103pf636oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?