| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Is there any impact of the shape of aortic end-hole cannula on stroke occurrence? Clinical evaluation of straight and bent-tip aortic cannulaeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, alexander.albert{at}heart-lahr.com
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Department of Neurology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Department of Neurology, Clinic Lahr, Lahr, Germany
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr/Baden, Lahr, Baden-Württemberg, Germany Objective: To compare the impact of straight and bent-tip aortic cannulae on stroke occurrence, location, and severity. Methods: Prospective data were collected on 8129 patients (coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valvular surgery). Bent-tip aortic cannulae were used in 15.6% of cases and straight end-hole cannulae in 84.4% of cases. Results: There were a total of 137 strokes: right anterior 52, left anterior 39, bilateral 23, posterior 18, and location not established5. With the use of bent-tip cannulae, the incidence of strokes was 0.9% versus 1.8% with straight cannulae (c2, p=0.026). Bilateral and posterior strokes occurred more often with the use of straight cannulae (c2, p= 0.015). Straight cannulae also related to the severity of strokes (c2, p= 0.003). Conclusions: There is an influence of the type of cannula on the occurrence, location, and severity of strokes. Straight cannulae cause significantly more often and more severe bilateral and posterior strokes than bent-tip cannulae.
Perfusion, Vol. 17, No. 6,
451-456 (2002) |
|||