Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flom-Halvorsen, H. I
Right arrow Articles by Øystese, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flom-Halvorsen, H. I
Right arrow Articles by Øystese, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of two differently heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits on markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction

Hanne I Flom-Halvorsen

Oslo Heart Center, Oslo, Norway, Research Institute for Internal Medicine, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway, hannef{at}klinmed.uio.no

E Øvrum

Oslo Heart Center, Oslo, Norway

F Brosstad

Research Institute for Internal Medicine, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

G Tangen

Oslo Heart Center, Oslo, Norway

M AL Ringdal

Oslo Heart Center, Oslo, Norway

R Øystese

Oslo Heart Center, Oslo, Norway

Objective: The two most commonly used heparin-coated systems for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are the Carmeda Bio-Active Surface (CBAS) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the Duraflo II coating (Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, CA, USA). The two surfaces are technically unequal and previous experimental studies have demonstrated disparities in effects on the immune system and blood cells. However, little is known concerning the influence of the two surfaces on markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction.

Methods: Forty patients undergoing elective, primary coronary bypass grafting with CPB were prospectively randomized to either the CBAS system or the Duraflo II circuit. During and after CPB, biological markers for brain dysfunction and myocardial injury were analysed.

Results: Both markers for brain dysfunction S-100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) increased significantly during CPB (p =0.01). The elevation during bypass correlated significantly with the duration of CPB (r = 0.39 and r= 0.38, respectively, both p< 0.02). NSE was somewhat more elevated in the Duraflo II group at the end of CPB (p =0.01) and 5 h after CPB (p= 0.02); for S-100B, there were no intergroup differences. Also, the markers related to myocardial injury, myoglobin and creatine kinase (CK-MB) mass increased during CPB (p= 0.01), while elevation of troponin-I occurred 5 h after CPB (p= 0.01). There were no statistically significant intergroup differences. No significant correlation was seen between the release of cardiac markers and the duration of CPB. The clinical course was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Except for a slightly higher elevation of NSE at the end of CPB and 5 h after CPB in the Duraflo II group, there were no significant differences between the CBAS group and the Duraflo II group concerning markers for brain and myocardial dysfunction.

Perfusion, Vol. 17, No. 5, 339-345 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659102pf594oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
O. Mangoush, S. Purkayastha, S. Haj-Yahia, J. Kinross, M. Hayward, F. Bartolozzi, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou
Heparin-bonded circuits versus nonheparin-bonded circuits: an evaluation of their effect on clinical outcomes
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1058 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al.
Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Taneja and D. C. Cheng
Con: Heparin-Bonded Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits Should Be Routine for All Cardiac Surgical Procedures
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1370 - 1372.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
T Gourlay and P Connolly
Does cardiopulmonary bypass still represent a good investment? The biomaterials perspective
Perfusion, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]