This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Davis, N. Articles by Sistino, J. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Davis, N. Articles by Sistino, J. J Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Review of ventricular rupture: key concepts and diagnostic tools for success

Cardiovascular Perfusion Program, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA

Joseph J Sistino

Cardiovascular Perfusion Program, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA

Although a rare complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ventricular rupture is a serious event associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Patients normally present with hemodynamic instability, often in cardiogenic shock. Despite improvements in surgical techniques and diagnostic tools, post-myocardial infarction ventricular rupture remains a difficult therapeutic challenge. There are three categories of ventricular rupture: free wall rupture (FWR), ventricular septal rupture (VSR), and papillary muscle rupture (PWR). The incidence of FWR occurs following up to 10% of myocardial infarctions. VSR and PWR have a lower incidence of 1-2% and 0.5-5%, respectively. Patients often present with single-vessel coronary artery disease and usually do not have a positive history for a previous myocardial infarction. The incidence of post infarction angina in these patients is significantly greater than in patients without ventricular rupture. Delay in treatment and continued physical activity post infarction increases the risk of ventricular rupture. Diagnostic tools such as two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization confirm the diagnosis of ventricular rupture in only 45-88% of cases. Knowledge of the disease progression is necessary to insure accurate and timely diagnosis. Due to the rapid deterioration of these patients, there is a 50-80% mortality rate within the first week if untreated. With surgical correction, patients can extend their 5-year survival rates to 65%. A good example of the complex course of ventricular rupture is the case of a 71-year-old patient at our institution. The patient presented in cardiogenic shock following an AMI. Preoperative diagnosis was unsuccessful in determining the extent of the ventricular rupture. The correct diagnosis was determined in the operating room, and both a mitral valve replacement and closure of a ventricular septal defect were completed. The patient was successfully treated with this difficult pathology.

Perfusion, Vol. 17, No. 1, 63-67 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0267659102pf521oa


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. W.M. van den Borne, J. Narula, J. W. Voncken, P. M. Lijnen, H. T.M. Vervoort-Peters, V. E.H. Dahlmans, J. F.M. Smits, M. J.A.P. Daemen, and W. M. Blankesteijn Defective intercellular adhesion complex in myocardium predisposes to infarct rupture in humans. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 3, 2008; 51(22): 2184 - 2192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]