Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gourlay, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gourlay, T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biomaterial development for cardiopulmonary bypass

T Gourlay

Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine at Hammersmith Campus, London

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is dependent on materials foreign to the patient for its successful application. When blood comes into contact with these so-called biomaterials, an inappropriate inflammatory response, which can be life-threatening in some patients, may develop. The reason for this inappropriate activation of host defence mechanisms is not entirely clear, however a number of strategies have evolved over the years to minimize this unwanted sequelae of CPB. These strategies include surface coating of the materials of the circuit, using new materials thought to improve biocompatibility, and using a number of pharmacological interventions designed to suppress the inflammatory response. Recently, there has been some evidence which indicates that the plasticizer employed in the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing of the CPB circuit may play a part in the development of the inflammatory response. The work described in this paper tends to support this thesis. These studies showed that by washing the plasticizer from the surface of the PVC tubing, the biocompatibility, as reflected in the upregulation of CD11b on the surface of neutrophils, was enhanced. Furthermore, the use of non-plasticized substitutes for PVC had a similar effect. The benefit from removing the plasticizer was similar to that gained from surface coating with heparin, one of the conventional approaches to reducing the inflammatory response to CPB.

Perfusion, Vol. 16, No. 5, 381-390 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026765910101600508


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. E. Asberg and V. Videm
Neutrophil dysfunction after biomaterial contact in an in vitro model of cardiopulmonary bypass
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 744 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
K. A Samolyk, S. R Beckmann, and R. C Bissinger
A new practical technique to reduce allogeneic blood exposure and hospital costs while preserving clotting factors after cardiopulmonary bypass: the Hemobag(R)
Perfusion, December 1, 2005; 20(6): 343 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. Abdel-Rahman, F. Ozaslan, P. S. Risteski, S. Martens, A. Moritz, A. Al Daraghmeh, H. Keller, and G. Wimmer-Greinecker
Initial Experience With a Minimized Extracorporeal Bypass System: Is There a Clinical Benefit?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 238 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. T. Lappegard, M. Fung, G. Bergseth, J. Riesenfeld, J. D. Lambris, V. Videm, and T. E. Mollnes
Effect of complement inhibition and heparin coating on artificial surface-induced leukocyte and platelet activation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 932 - 941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
S. Gunaydin
Clinical significance of coated extracorporeal circuits: a review of novel technologies
Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S33 - S41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
T Gourlay and P Connolly
Does cardiopulmonary bypass still represent a good investment? The biomaterials perspective
Perfusion, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
T. Gourlay, I. Samartzis, and K. M Taylor
The effect of haemodilution on blood/biomaterial contact-mediated CD11b expression on neutrophils: ex vivo studies
Perfusion, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 87 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
V. Vijay and K. McCusker
Recent advances in biocompatible surface-modifying additives for cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 2003; 18(1_suppl): 41 - 45.
[PDF]