Perfusion

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stammers, A. H
Right arrow Articles by Mejak, B. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stammers, A. H
Right arrow Articles by Mejak, B. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Perfusion, Vol. 16, No. 3, 189-198 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/026765910101600304

An update on perfusion safety: does the type of perfusion practice affect the rate of incidents related to cardiopulmonary bypass?

Alfred H Stammers

Division of Clinical Perfusion Education, University of Nebraska, Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, astammer{at}unmc.edu

Brian L Mejak

Division of Clinical Perfusion Education, University of Nebraska, Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) techniques vary among adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This may result in a differential conduct of CPB between various aged patients. The present study reports on perfusion incidents occurring in hospitals using extracorporeal circulation.

An 80 question survey was mailed to chief perfusionists at all 1030 US cardiac surgical centers. Respondents were asked to report on device use and incidents occurring during a 2-year period from July 1996 to June 1998.

Five hundred and twenty-four completed surveys were returned with the age of surgical patients operated on at each hospital defined as either an adult (n=407), pediatric (n=17), or combined-adult and pediatric (n=100). Centrifugal pumps were used as the primary systemic pumps in 54% of adult, 12% of pediatric, and 36% of combined centers. In-line blood gas monitoring was used in 76% of all pediatric hospitals, but in only 30% of adult facilities. Incident rates occurred once per every 120.9, 83.9, and 220.2 cases in adult, pediatric, and combined centers, respectively. Mortality rates related to CPB occurred 2.7 times higher in adult and pediatric centers as compared to combined hospitals. Arterial dissection was the number one cause of death in both pediatric and combined hospitals, while coagulation disturbances resulted in the highest mortality for adult procedures.

Results of this study show that the lowest incident rates occur at hospitals performing combined adult and pediatric CPB.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
K. G. Shann, D. S. Likosky, J. M. Murkin, R. A. Baker, Y. R. Baribeau, G. R. DeFoe, T. A. Dickinson, T. J. Gardner, H. P. Grocott, G. T. O'Connor, et al.
An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 283 - 290.e3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
S. Svenmarker and M. Appelblad
Reporting of perfusion-related incidents: pitfalls and limitations
Perfusion, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 243 - 248.
[PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
D. A Palanzo
Perfusion safety: defining the problem
Perfusion, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 195 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
R. Ginther Jr, R. Fillingham, B. Searles, and E. Darling
Departmental use of perfusion crisis management drills: 2002 survey results
Perfusion, September 1, 2003; 18(5): 299 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
W. J DeBois, L. N Girardi, L. Y Lee, C. Mack, B. Elmer, K. McCusker, J. McVey, K. H Krieger, and O W. Isom
Negative fluid displacement: an alternative method to assess patency of arterial line cannulation
Perfusion, January 1, 2003; 18(1): 67 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
F. Merkle, W. Bottcher, and R. Hetzer
Prebypass filtration of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: an outdated technique?
Perfusion, January 1, 2003; 18(1_suppl): 81 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
M Hargrove, B C Ramish, A O'Donnell, and T Aherne
Electrical failure during cardiopulmonary bypass: an evaluation of incidence, causes, management and guidelines for preventative measures
Perfusion, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 369 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]