|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Perfusion, Vol. 15, No. 6,
485-494 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026765910001500603
Investigation and quantification of the blood trauma caused by the combined dynamic forces experienced during cardiopulmonary bypass
J W Mulholland
Medical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London and Department of Clinical Perfusion, Cardiac Surgery, St Bartholomews Hospital and the Royal London Trust, London
W Massey
Department of Clinical Perfusion, Cardiac Surgery, St Bartholomews Hospital and the Royal London Trust, London
J C Shelton
Medical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London
Blood is exposed to various dynamic forces during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Understanding the damaging nature of these forces is paramount for research and development of the CPB circuit. The object of this study was to identify the most damaging dynamic non-physiological forces and then quantify this damage.
A series of in vitro experiments simulated the different combinations of dynamic forces experienced during CPB while damage to the blood was closely monitored.
A combination of air interface (a) and negative pressure (P) caused the greatest rate of change in plasma Hb ( p Hb) (4.94 10-3 mg/dl/s) followed by negative pressure and then an air interface. Shear stresses, positive pressures, wall impact forces and a blood-nonendothelial surface caused the least damage (0.26 10-3 mg/dl/s). An air interface showed no threshold value for blood damage, with the relationship between the size of the interface and the blood damage modelled by a second-order polynomial. However, negative pressure did exhibit a threshold value at -120 mmHg, beyond which point there was a linear relationship.
Investigating the reasons for the increased blood trauma caused by the low-pressure suction (LPS) system makes it clear how research into minimizing or completely avoiding certain forces must be the next step to advancing extracorporeal technology.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Fabre, A. Vincentelli, D. Corseaux, F. Juthier, S. Susen, A. Bauters, E. Van Belle, F. Mouquet, T. Le Tourneau, C. Decoene, et al.
Comparison of blood activation in the wound, active vent, and cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
August 1, 2008;
86(2):
537 - 541.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.W. Mulholland, J.R. Anderson, G.J. Yarham, S. Tuladhur, I. Saed, and M.D. Oliver
Miniature cardiopulmonary bypass--the Hammersmith experience.
Perfusion,
May 1, 2007;
22(3):
161 - 166.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J W Mulholland
The Great Britain and Ireland perspective: current perfusion safety issues, preparing for the future
Perfusion,
July 1, 2005;
20(4):
217 - 225.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Tschakovsky and D. D. Sheriff
Immediate exercise hyperemia: contributions of the muscle pump vs. rapid vasodilation
J Appl Physiol,
August 1, 2004;
97(2):
739 - 747.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Albes, I. M. Stohr, M. Kaluza, A. Siegemund, D. Schmidt, R. Vollandt, and T. Wahlers
Physiological coagulation can be maintained in extracorporeal circulation by means of shed blood separation and coating
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
November 1, 2003;
126(5):
1504 - 1512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Wright
Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: update
Perfusion,
September 1, 2001;
16(5):
345 - 351.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|