This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Spanier, T. Articles by Mongero, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Spanier, T. Articles by Mongero, L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Endotoxin in pooled pericardial blood contributes to the systemic inflammatory response during cardiac surgery

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Perfusion, Columbia University, tbs8{at}columbia.edu

Kelly Tector

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Perfusion, Columbia University

Graham Schwartz

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Perfusion, Columbia University

Jonathan Chen

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Perfusion, Columbia University

Mehmet Oz

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Perfusion, Columbia University

James Beck

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Perfusion, Columbia University

Linda Mongero

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Perfusion, Columbia University

Although endotoxin has been implicated as an important contributor to the systemic inflammatory response (SIR) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), its source remains unclear. While gut translocation has traditionally been perceived as the primary source of endotoxemia, accumulation of endotoxin in pooled pericardial blood may represent an additional source of endotoxin that is continually reinfused into the CPB circuit.

Eighteen patients undergoing primary coronary revascularization procedures were prospectively evaluated. Shed blood pooled in the pericardial space was returned to the CPB circuit through cardiotomy suction catheters at 45 min after placement of the aortic crossclamp. Simultaneous samples of pooled pericardial and peripheral arterial blood were obtained and analyzed by a limulus amebocyte lysate assay for the determination of endotoxin concentration, and an enzyme-linked immonosorbert assay for tumor necrosis factor (TNF-) levels.

Significant elevations in endotoxin were demonstrated in pooled pericardial blood samples compared with arterial blood (3.5 ± 0.5 vs 0.8 ± 0.2 pg/ml; p < 0.05). TNF- levels were below the limits of detection in both samples.

These data implicate pooled pericardial blood as an important primary source of endotoxin that, when continually reinfused throughout CPB, may contribute to the overall SIR. Because endotoxemia has been identified as an important predictor of adverse outcomes following cardiac surgery, removal of endotoxin antigen in shed pericardial blood, prior to its reinfusion into the CPB circuit, may provide a directed means to improve perioperative outcome without compromising established blood conservation techniques.

Perfusion, Vol. 15, No. 5, 427-431 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/026765910001500504


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservatio, V. A. Ferraris, S. P. Ferraris, S. P. Saha, E. A. Hessel II, C. K. Haan, B. D. Royston, C. R. Bridges, R. S.D. Higgins, G. Despotis, et al. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Guideline Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5_Supplement): S27 - S86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Shann, D. S. Likosky, J. M. Murkin, R. A. Baker, Y. R. Baribeau, G. R. DeFoe, T. A. Dickinson, T. J. Gardner, H. P. Grocott, G. T. O'Connor, et al. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 283 - 290.e3. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Westerberg, J. Gabel, A. Bengtsson, J. Sellgren, O. Eidem, and A. Jeppsson Hemodynamic effects of cardiotomy suction blood J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1352 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M J ten Brinke, P W Weerwind, S Teerenstra, J C. Feron, W van der Meer, and M H. Brouwer Leukocyte removal efficiency of cell-washed and unwashed whole blood: an in vitro study Perfusion, December 1, 2005; 20(6): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Eisses, K. Seidel, G. S. Aldea, and W. L. Chandler Reducing Hemostatic Activation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Combined Approach Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1208 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Risnes, T. Ueland, R. Lundblad, T. E. Mollnes, S. T. Baksaas, P. Aukrust, and J. L. Svennevig Changes in the cytokine network and complement parameters during open heart surgery Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, March 1, 2003; 2(1): 19 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.-C. Hsu Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits: current status Perfusion, September 1, 2001; 16(5): 417 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]