Perfusion

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ninni, K. M
Right arrow Articles by Brownstein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ninni, K. M
Right arrow Articles by Brownstein, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Perfusion, Vol. 14, No. 3, 213-218 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919901400310
© 1999 SAGE Publications

Patient outcome as a selection criterion in determining treatment mode

Kimberly M Ninni

School of Cardiovascular Perfusion, The Cooper Health System, Camden, New Jersey

Louis Brownstein

School of Cardiovascular Perfusion, The Cooper Health System, Camden, New Jersey

The climate of health care reform encourages scrutiny of traditional and new forms of medical and surgical therapy. With the emergence of technologically innovative cardiac procedures, therapy advocates must weigh cost versus patient outcomes. Therapies range from purely medical management, through staged interventions, to median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. Outcomes will necessarily be related to quality of life. A literature search was performed to determine types of medical and surgical therapies associated with patient outcomes as they define quality of life. Medical treatment may include the use of anti-platelet therapy, beta-blockers and diuretics to treat the cardiac patient at low risk who can maintain an acceptable quality of life. Improvements in medical therapies may extend the life of the low-risk patient, eliminating the need to consider bypass surgery. Some patients at high risk, or with left ventricular hypertrophy combined with an impaired ejection fraction, may require coronary artery bypass surgery. Studies indicate that patients undergoing open heart surgery demonstrate significant improvement in functional classification, increased activity and reduction in anti-anginal medications. Proponents of minimally invasive surgery claim potential benefits of lower surgical trauma, shorter hospital stays and shorter recovery times. Quality of life is defined by outcomes. Only by comparing outcomes of all available therapies can a physician or patient make an informed decision regarding treatment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?