|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: an in vivo comparison of standard roller pumps, nonocclusive roller pumps and centrifugal pumps
S D Hansbro
The Yorkshire Heart Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds
D AC Sharpe
The Yorkshire Heart Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds
R Catchpole
The Yorkshire Heart Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds
K R Welsh
The Yorkshire Heart Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds
C M Munsch
The Yorkshire Heart Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds
J P McGoldrick
The Yorkshire Heart Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds
P H Kay
The Yorkshire Heart Centre, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) involves the use of either an occlusive roller pump or centrifugal pump. Damage to blood elements, including haemolysis, may arise from occlusion when using a roller pump; the appropriate degree of occlusion has not yet been determined scientifically. Centrifugal and nonocclusive roller pumps are reputed to reduce haemolysis.
The objective of this study was to compare haemolysis caused by a standard roller pump with a dynamically set nonocclusive roller pump and with a centrifugal pump.
We prospectively randomized 60 patients undergoing routine coronary artery surgery into three groups: standard roller pump (STD, n = 20), dynamically set roller pump (DYN, n = 20), or centrifugal pump (CEN, n = 20). The level of plasma free haemoglobin (FHb) was measured preoperatively, and the rate of formation of FHb (in mg/dl/min) was determined at the end of the ischaemic phase and at the end of CPB. Cardiotomy suction blood was isolated for the ischaemic phase and returned before the end of CPB.
It was found that there were no differences between the groups in demographic or operative variables. The rate of formation of FHb at the end of the ischaemic phase was similar for all groups (STD 0.108 ± 0.10, DYN 0.117 ± 0.08, CEN 0.129 ± 0.07). At the end of CPB, after return of the cardiotomy suction blood, there was a significant (<0.001) increase in the rate of formation of FHb in all groups. The increase was similar for each of the groups (STD 0.424 ± 0.17, DYN 0.481 ± 0.20, CEN 0.471 ± 0.18).
We conclude that the rates of haemolysis are similar for each of the pump types, and no benefit is conferred by the use of either a dynamically set roller pump or a centrifugal pump compared with the standard roller pump. The return of the cardiotomy suction blood to the circulation is the principal source of plasma free haemoglobin.
Perfusion, Vol. 14, No. 1,
3-10 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919901400102

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Castiglioni, A. Verzini, N. Colangelo, S. Nascimbene, G. Laino, and O. Alfieri
Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement: a randomized study
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
July 1, 2009;
9(1):
37 - 41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R Issitt, T Cumberland, A Clements, and J Mulholland
Clinical evaluation of the Admiral 1.35m2 hollow-fibre membrane oxygenator
Perfusion,
January 1, 2008;
23(1):
33 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Castiglioni, A. Verzini, F. Pappalardo, N. Colangelo, L. Torracca, A. Zangrillo, and O. Alfieri
Minimally Invasive Closed Circuit Versus Standard Extracorporeal Circulation for Aortic Valve Replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
February 1, 2007;
83(2):
586 - 591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C R Valeri, H Macgregor, G Ragno, N Healey, J Fonger, and S F Khuri
Effects of centrifugal and roller pumps on survival of autologous red cells in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery
Perfusion,
September 1, 2006;
21(5):
291 - 296.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Asante-Siaw, J. Tyrrell, A. Hoschtitzky, and J. Dunning
Does the use of a centrifugal pump offer any additional benefit for patients having open heart surgery?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
April 1, 2006;
5(2):
128 - 134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J Fransen, Y. M Ganushchak, V. Vijay, D. S de Jong, W. A Buurman, and J. G Maessen
Evaluation of a new condensed extra-corporeal circuit for cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized clinical pilot study
Perfusion,
March 1, 2005;
20(2):
91 - 99.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Noora, A. Lamy, K. M Smith, R. Kent, D. Batt, J. Fedoryshyn, and X. Wang
The effect of oxygenator membranes on blood: a comparison of two oxygenators in open-heart surgery
Perfusion,
September 1, 2003;
18(5):
313 - 320.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Hayashi, M. Ohtani, T. Soma, and Y. Sasako
Aortic valve replacement for a patient with warm-reactive autoimmune hemolytic anemia
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
December 1, 2002;
22(6):
1026 - 1028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Naughton and C. A. Bashour
Mechanical Support After Cardiac Surgery
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
September 1, 2002;
6(3):
237 - 257.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Appelblad and G. Engstrom
Fat contamination of pericardial suction blood and its influence on in vitro capillary-pore flow properties in patients undergoing routine coronary artery bypass grafting
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
August 1, 2002;
124(2):
377 - 386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. De Somer, Y. Van Belleghem, F. Caes, K. Francois, H. Van Overbeke, J. Arnout, Y. Taeymans, and G. Van Nooten
Tissue factor as the main activator of the coagulation system during cardiopulmonary bypass
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
May 1, 2002;
123(5):
951 - 958.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T Amand, J Pincemail, F Blaffart, R Larbuisson, R Limet, and J O Defraigne
Levels of inflammatory markers in the blood processed by autotransfusion devices during cardiac surgery associated with cardiopulmonary bypass circuit
Perfusion,
March 1, 2002;
17(2):
117 - 123.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Pierangeli, V Masieri, F Bruzzi, E De Toni, G Grillone, P Boni, and A Delnevo
Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: how to reduce the free haemoglobin by managing the suctioned blood separately
Perfusion,
December 1, 2001;
16(6):
519 - 524.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Hayashi, K. Kagisaki, T. Yamaguchi, T. Sakaguchi, Y. Naka, Y. Sawa, S. Ohtake, and H. Matsuda
Clinical application of vacuum-assisted cardiopulmonary bypass with a pressure relief valve
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2001;
20(3):
621 - 626.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Wright
Haemolysis during cardiopulmonary bypass: update
Perfusion,
September 1, 2001;
16(5):
345 - 351.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Cirri, L. Negri, M. Babbini, G. Latis, B. Khlat, G. Tarelli, P. Panisi, E. Mazzaro, A. Bellisario, B. Borghetti, et al.
Haemolysis due to active venous drainage during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of two different techniques
Perfusion,
July 1, 2001;
16(4):
313 - 318.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Weerasinghe, P. Hornick, P. Smith, K. Taylor, and C. Ratnatunga
Coronary artery bypass grafting in non-dialysis-dependent mild-to-moderate renal dysfunction
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
June 1, 2001;
121(6):
1083 - 1089.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Reents, J. Babin-Ebell, and O. Elert
Remaining procoagulant property of wound blood washed by a cell-saving device: Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg.,
May 1, 2001;
71(5):
1749 - 1750.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A O Chukwuemeka, M R. Turtle, U H Trivedi, G E Venn, and D J Chambers
A clinical evaluation of platelet function, haemolysis and oxygen transfer during cardiopulmonary bypass comparing the Quantum HF-6700 to the HF-5700 hollow fibre membrane oxygenator
Perfusion,
December 1, 2000;
15(6):
479 - 484.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J W Mulholland, W Massey, and J C Shelton
Investigation and quantification of the blood trauma caused by the combined dynamic forces experienced during cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion,
December 1, 2000;
15(6):
485 - 494.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Parolari, F. Alamanni, M. Naliato, R. Spirito, V. Franze, G. Pompilio, M. Agrifoglio, and P. Biglioli
Adult cardiac surgery outcomes: role of the pump type
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
November 1, 2000;
18(5):
575 - 582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|