Perfusion

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ündar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoon, J. H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ündar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoon, J. H
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Perfusion, Vol. 13, No. 5, 346-352 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919801300511

Testing neonate-infant membrane oxygenators with the University of Texas neonatal pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass system in vitro

Akif Ündar

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas and Biomedical Medical Engineering Program, College of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, undar{at}uthscsa.edu

Marian C Holland

Biomedical Medical Engineering Program, College of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas and Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas

Russel V Howelton

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Cherie K Benson

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Jose R Ybarra

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

O LaWayne Miller

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Mario M Rossbach

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Thomas M Runge

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas and Biomedical Medical Engineering Program, College of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

Scott B Johnson

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Edward Y Sako

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

John H Calhoon

Cardiothoracic Research Laboratory, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Neurologic complications are already well documented after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures in neonates and infants. Physiologic pulsatile flow CPB systems may be the alternative to the currently used steady-flow CPB circuits. In addition to the pulsatile pump, a membrane oxygenator should be chosen carefully, because only a few membrane oxygenators are suitable for physiologic pulsatile flow. We have tested four different types of neonate-infant membrane oxygenators for physiologic pulsatility with The University of Texas neonate-infant pulsatile CPB system in vitro. Evaluation criteria were based on mean ejection time, extracorporeal circuit (ECC) pressure, and upstroke of dp/dt. The results suggested that the Capiox 308 hollow-fibre membrane oxygenator produced the best physiologic pulsatile waveform according to the ejection time, ECC pressure, and the upstroke of dp/dt. The Minimax Plus and Masterflo Infant hollow-fibre membrane oxygenators also produced adequate pulsatile flow. Only the Variable Prime Cobe Membrane Lung (VPCML) Plus flat-sheet membrane oxygenator failed to reach the criteria for physiologic pulsatility. Depending on the oxygenator used, the lowest priming volume of the infant CPB circuit was 415 ml and the highest 520 ml.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
A. Undar, C. D Fraser Jr, and M. J Elliott
Letter to the editor
Perfusion, May 1, 2000; 15(3): 261 - 262.
[PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
A. Undar, K. M Koenig, O H Frazier, and C. D Fraser Jr
Impact of membrane oxygenators on pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion in a neonatal model
Perfusion, March 1, 2000; 15(2): 111 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Undar, T. Masai, S.-Q. Yang, J. Goddard-Finegold, O.H. Frazier, and C. D. Fraser Jr
Effects of perfusion mode on regional and global organ blood flow in a neonatal piglet model
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 68(4): 1336 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]