This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mahoney, C B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mahoney, C B. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Heparin-bonded circuits: clinical outcomes and costs

Industrial Relations Center, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

The aim of this study was to use meta-analysis to combine the results of numerous studies and examine the impact of heparin-bonded circuits on clinical outcomes and the resulting costs. Heparin-bonded circuits, both ionically and covalently bonded, are examined separately.

The results of the study provide evidence that heparin-bonded circuits result in improved clinical outcomes when compared to the identical nonheparin-bonded circuits. These improved clinical outcomes result in subsequent lower costs per patient with their use. However, differences are apparent in the significance and magnitude of these outcomes between ionically and covalently bonded circuits. Covalently bonded circuits provide a greater magnitude and significance of improvement in clinical outcomes than ionically bonded circuits. Total cost savings can be expected to be three times greater with covalently bonded circuits ($3231 versus $1068).

It was concluded that the choice regarding the use of a heparin-bonded circuits and the type of heparin-bonded circuit used has the potential to alter clinical outcomes and subsequent costs. Cost consideration cannot be ignored, but clinical benefits should be the main rationale for the choice of cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. This analysis provides evidence that clinical benefits and cost savings can both be derived from use of the same technology - covalently bonded circuits.

Perfusion, Vol. 13, No. 3, 192-204 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919801300307


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. S. Murphy, E. A. Hessel II, and R. C. Groom Optimal Perfusion During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: An Evidence-Based Approach Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2009; 108(5): 1394 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Mangoush, S. Purkayastha, S. Haj-Yahia, J. Kinross, M. Hayward, F. Bartolozzi, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou Heparin-bonded circuits versus nonheparin-bonded circuits: an evaluation of their effect on clinical outcomes Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1058 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G. Shann, D. S. Likosky, J. M. Murkin, R. A. Baker, Y. R. Baribeau, G. R. DeFoe, T. A. Dickinson, T. J. Gardner, H. P. Grocott, G. T. O'Connor, et al. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 283 - 290.e3. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M van den Goor, W. van Oeveren, P. M Rutten, J. G Tijssen, and L. Eijsman Adhesion of thrombotic components to the surface of a clinically used oxygenator is not affected by Trillium coating Perfusion, May 1, 2006; 21(3): 165 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Gunaydin Clinical significance of coated extracorporeal circuits: a review of novel technologies Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S33 - S41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Baufreton, J. L. de Brux, P. Binuani, J.-J. Corbeau, J. B. Subayi, J. C. Daniel, and P. Treanor A combined approach for improving cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery surgery: a pilot study Perfusion, December 1, 2002; 17(6): 407 - 413. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J A Murphy, C M Savage, S K Alpard, D J Deyo, J B Jayroe, and J B Zwischenberger Low-dose versus high-dose heparinization during arteriovenous carbon dioxide removal Perfusion, December 1, 2001; 16(6): 460 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. F Larson, D. Arzouman, L. Kleinert, V. Patula, and S. Williams Comparison of Sarns 3M heparin bonded to Duraflo II and control circuits in a porcine model: macro- and microanalysis of thrombi accumulation in circuit arterial filters Perfusion, January 1, 2000; 15(1): 13 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]