Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darling, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darling, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lawson, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Surgery
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Techniques of paediatric modified ultrafiltration: 1996 survey results

Edward Darling

Perfusion Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Kathy Nanry

Perfusion Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Ian Shearer

Perfusion Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

David Kaemmer

Perfusion Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Scott Lawson

Perfusion Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

In September 1996, perfusionists from 50 paediatric open-heart surgery programmes were contacted to identify centres that are currently using the technique of modified ultrafiltration (MUF). Of the 50 centres contacted, 22 (44%) were utilizing the technique. These centres were surveyed on the following: neonatal circuit description, patient entry criteria, MUF circuit description, conduct of MUF, use of extracorporeal safety devices and/or modifications, and technical complications. All 22 centres used roller pumps and membrane oxygenators. In 19 centres, MUF was utilized exclusively in the arteriovenous mode (86%), while two centres (9%) used the venovenous mode and one centre (5%) used both methods. Most (82%) of the 22 MUF centres used a blood cardioplegia system for myocardial preservation. After cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), these blood cardioplegia systems were often converted for use as MUF circuits in a variety of ways. Other methods of accessing the CPB circuit for MUF included utilizing either a recirculation line or a dedicated port added to the circuit specifically for MUF. Blood flow rates during MUF, pump strategies, haemoconcentrator vacuum levels and endpoints were variable from centre to centre. Technical complications related to MUF were reported by 82% of the surveyed MUF centres. The most common complication, air cavitating into the circuit, was reported by 15 centres. From these data, we propose recommendations on the integration of MUF into CPB circuits, the conduct of perfusion during MUF, and appropriate safety considerations to minimize technical complications.

Perfusion, Vol. 13, No. 2, 93-103 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919801300204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. F. Corno
Systemic venous drainage: can we help Newton?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 31(6): 1044 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
S. G Raja, S. Yousufuddin, F. Rasool, A. Nubi, M. Danton, and J. Pollock
Impact of modified ultrafiltration on morbidity after pediatric cardiac surgery.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, August 1, 2006; 14(4): 341 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. W. Gaynor
Use of ultrafiltration during and after cardiopulmonary bypass in children
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(90030): S98 - 100.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. R. Stephenson Jr and J. L. Myers
Pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2001; 72(6): 2176 - 2177.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. W. Gaynor
Use of ultrafiltration during and after cardiopulmonary bypass in children
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 209 - 211.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
S. T. Verghese
Modified Ultrafiltration in Children
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2001; 5(1): 98 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Brancaccio, F. Miraldi, L. Tritapepe, M. Goracci, and E. Prifti
A circuit to perform a combined ultrafiltration procedure in pediatric open heart surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2000; 70(3): 990 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
G. J Myers, R. B Leadon, L. B Mitchell, and D. B Ross
Simple modified ultrafiltration
Perfusion, September 1, 2000; 15(5): 447 - 452.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PerfusionHome page
E. Darling, S. Harris-Holloway, F. H Kern, R. Ungerleider, J. Jaggers, S. Lawson, and I. Shearer
Impact of modifying priming components and fluid administration using miniaturized circuitry in neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 2000; 15(1): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]