Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Perfusion
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannebach, P. C
Right arrow Articles by Sistino, J. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannebach, P. C
Right arrow Articles by Sistino, J. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Monitoring aortic root effluent during retrograde cardioplegia delivery

Patrick C Mannebach

Program in Extracorporeal Circulation Technology, College of Health Professions, The Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina

Joseph J Sistino

Program in Extracorporeal Circulation Technology, College of Health Professions, The Medical University of South Carolina, South Carolina

Continuous monitoring of myocardial protection during aortic crossclamping is not always performed, due to limitations with current technology. The purpose of this study was to use readily available technology to evaluate the effectiveness of retrograde cardioplegia delivery by monitoring the aortic root vent effluent.

The CDI 400, a commonly used blood monitoring device, was used to monitor changes in temperature, pO2, pCO2, and pH by placing a 1/4-inch CDI Quick Cell and probe in the aortic root vent line prior to each case. Twenty adult patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery were involved in the study, which resulted in 48 doses of retrograde cardioplegic solution. The study revealed a significant correlation between the temperature of the cardioplegia solution and the temperature of the aortic root effluent (p <0.001, r = 0.88). The cardioplegia temperature did not correlate with the change in effluent pO2 (p = NS) or the degree of effluent temperature change (p = NS). Furthermore, the change in effluent temperature was not influenced by the amount of cardioplegia solution delivered (p = NS), or the time between administrations (p = NS). Both the decreasing and increasing trends of the effluent pO2 significantly correlated with the cardioplegia solution flow rate (p = 0.034, r = 0.32 and p = 0.013, r = 0.37, respectively), but not with the time between doses (p = NS) or volume of cardioplegia solution delivered (p = NS). The increase in effluent pO2 did correlate with the coronary sinus pressure (p < 0.001, r = 0.48).

Measuring aortic root vent effluent may be used to assure the successful delivery of retrograde cardioplegic solution and aid in the detection of various procedural problems. Once the trends from this technique are established by the surgical team, they may be used to adjust cardioplegic solution administration and provide documentation of myocardial protection.

Perfusion, Vol. 12, No. 5, 317-323 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026765919701200507


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?